VC Dimension and Distribution-Free Sample-Based Testing

APA

(2020). VC Dimension and Distribution-Free Sample-Based Testing. The Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing. https://simons.berkeley.edu/talks/testing-monotonicity-and-convexity-high-dimensions

MLA

VC Dimension and Distribution-Free Sample-Based Testing. The Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing, Dec. 14, 2020, https://simons.berkeley.edu/talks/testing-monotonicity-and-convexity-high-dimensions

BibTex

          @misc{ scivideos_16858,
            doi = {},
            url = {https://simons.berkeley.edu/talks/testing-monotonicity-and-convexity-high-dimensions},
            author = {},
            keywords = {},
            language = {en},
            title = {VC Dimension and Distribution-Free Sample-Based Testing},
            publisher = {The Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing},
            year = {2020},
            month = {dec},
            note = {16858 see, \url{https://scivideos.org/Simons-Institute/16858}}
          }
          
Eric Blais (University of Waterloo)
Source Repository Simons Institute

Abstract

When can we test functions more efficiently than we can learn them? We will consider this fundamental problem in the standard PAC learning setting, which corresponds to the sample-based distribution-free property testing model. The VC dimension of a class of functions characterizes the number of samples needed to learn the class. But since some properties can indeed be tested more efficiently than they can be learned, VC dimension by itself does not characterize the number of samples needed to test it. Nonetheless, we will see that VC dimension combined with a closely-related “lower VC dimension" variant does give strong lower bounds on the number of samples required to test many properties of functions, including halfspaces, intersection of halfspaces, polynomial threshold functions, and decision trees. This is joint work with Renato Ferreira Pinto Jr. and Nathan Harms.